GoldenEye 007 Nintendo 64 Community, GoldenEye X, Nintendo 64 Games Discussion

[00Dark]

Wow, I don't feel like posting a paragraph. Self explanatory. Have fun.

http://www.goldeneyevault.com/viewfile.php?id=199

[Wreck]

Very nice work, 00Dark. I'll have to check this out in a bit.
_________________

YOUTUBE | FACEBOOK | VAULT | MOD DB | RHDN

[fantsu]

OMG looks awesome!


...but the link doesn't work for me.
Going to try later on.

[katiekurick]

Could you please post the code on this topic? I'm not sure how I would get the code from that link...Sorry, but it would be very helpful.

[Dragonsbrethren]

It's not a code; it's a patch. Click the Download link on the linked entry, then read this.

[EternallyAries]

Wellcom to the forms katiekurick but no its not a GameShark code its a download but you need to make ser you have a zip open Program katiekurick i think most computer come with one.
_________________
There totally nothing to read here.

[katiekurick]

Whenever I apply the patch, the ROM created gets so glitchy, it's not right. I even have version 1.1. I'm new to these forums, and I'm not sure if this sort of discussion is allowed here but I need a little help.

[EternallyAries]

you need to go to the Goldeneye Vault.com and Download the latess Editor now you may think im insane becuse its goldeneye But not PD But SubDrag has put the Updated PD Editor in goldeneye Editor wich will help you pache it. hope i help.
_________________
There totally nothing to read here.

[HackBond]

katiekurick wrote:

Whenever I apply the patch, the ROM created gets so glitchy, it's not right. I even have version 1.1. I'm new to these forums, and I'm not sure if this sort of discussion is allowed here but I need a little help.

Did you use the PD xdelta patching?
_________________
Also known as Spyster or Nyxem
[Youtube]

[Decoy] Antenna | Control | Silo | Escape

[Dragonsbrethren]

If you're using Project 64 or 1964, you need to update the ROM settings to match an unmodified PD ROM.

PJ64: Right click on the ROM in the ROM list and choose Edit Game Settings, or load it and click Options -> Settings -> Rom Settings tab. Change the options to:

CPU core style: Recompiler
Self-modifying code method: Protect Memory
Memory Size: 8 MB
Advanced Block Linking: Off
Default Save Type: 16kbit Eeprom
Counter Factor: 2
*Larger Compile Buffer
*Register caching
*Use TLB

1964: Highlight the ROM in the list, or load it, and click the toolbar button with the hand pointing at the document. Change the options to:

Expansion Pak: Yes
Save Type: EEPROM
EEPROM Size: 16Kb EEPROM
Timing Control: No
Self-Modifying Code: Protect Memory

Anything not mentioned can be left with the default settings (if you played around with them already, they all have "(default)" in their name).

[fantsu]

do counter factor and advanced block linking really affect?
not for me anyways.
counter factor 1 just makes the game so much smoother.
depends from the computer of course.

[Dragonsbrethren]

PJ64 is much slower with CF1 for me. Also, when I lowered 1964 to CF2 it ran way too fast compared to CF3. I don't know if they handle them differently or what, but I figured it's safest to stick with the default in both.

[katiekurick]

Spyster wrote:

katiekurick wrote: Whenever I apply the patch, the ROM created gets so glitchy, it's not right. I even have version 1.1. I'm new to these forums, and I'm not sure if this sort of discussion is allowed here but I need a little help. Did you use the PD xdelta patching?

Yes, and still, it's really buggy. Like I go to make a new file, but I can't. Says everything is full, and it cannot detect an expansion pak.

[Dragonsbrethren]

You need to change the ROM settings, like I described in my post above. Alternatively, you can try playing with one of the Mupen64 variations, but those run the game slower than PJ64 or 1964 do.

[katiekurick]

Dragonsbrethren wrote:

You need to change the ROM settings, like I described in my post above. Alternatively, you can try playing with one of the Mupen64 variations, but those run the game slower than PJ64 or 1964 do.

I did what you suggested, and it didn't change a thing ): thanks anyway for the help.