 |
 |
GoldenEye 007 Nintendo 64 Community, GoldenEye X, Nintendo 64 Games Discussion
GoldenEye Cheats, GoldenEye X Codes, Tips, Help, Nintendo 64 Gaming Community
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soopaweirdo
Agent
Joined: 09 Sep 2010
Posts: 37
|
 Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 12:15 pm Post subject: Testing updates and add-ons on a mainstream console...? |
  |
|
Today at school, I got wind that Bethesda would test out the add-ons for Fallout: New Vegas (Which actually looks more interesting than it's precursor, because Fallout 3 was crap to me, really), and I overheard from my friend that they would test out the add-ons for it by marketing them for the Xbox 360 first.
Now, I'm not too versatile in the metaphorical world of next-gen gaming, but I want to ask your opinions on the subject at hand, as the situation above has some sort of relevance: If a game had a PC port, do you think that they should release extra add-ons there first and make updates regularly? I mean, I understand that they do that with Team Fortress 2, but this situation makes little sense to me...
What do you guys think?
Last edited by Soopaweirdo on Tue Oct 19, 2010 3:48 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EternallyAries
007
Joined: 05 Oct 2009
Posts: 1943
Location: Las Vegas
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well i never play a fallout game yet but i can say this if it did ever come out on the pc. I think they should release extra add ons to.
_________________
There totally nothing to read here. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
acceptable67
007
Joined: 16 Jan 2010
Posts: 1738
Location: US
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 2:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Fallout 3 was terrible. I would never buy Fallout.
Now Fallout: New Vegas? Please.
_________________
| Rare wrote: | | Perfect Dark Forever. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Soopaweirdo
Agent
Joined: 09 Sep 2010
Posts: 37
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 19, 2010 3:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| acceptable67 wrote: | Fallout 3 was terrible. I would never buy Fallout.
Now Fallout: New Vegas? Please. |
Is this a sarcastic remark to my comment or the truth? Because I just feel that Fallout 3 wasn't too great of a game. I look at New Vegas and I see that a ton of things were fixed in Fallout: New Vegas.
It's not really the same thing, you know. |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
acceptable67
007
Joined: 16 Jan 2010
Posts: 1738
Location: US
|
| Posted: Wed Oct 20, 2010 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Soopaweirdo wrote: | | acceptable67 wrote: | Fallout 3 was terrible. I would never buy Fallout.
Now Fallout: New Vegas? Please. |
Is this a sarcastic remark to my comment or the truth? Because I just feel that Fallout 3 wasn't too great of a game. I look at New Vegas and I see that a ton of things were fixed in Fallout: New Vegas.
It's not really the same thing, you know. |
Well. The same rule applies to "Never judge something by it's cover"
So I'll have to see.
_________________
| Rare wrote: | | Perfect Dark Forever. |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
|
|
